Which is NOT a direct hazard to a person from RF exposure?

Heating of your body tissues

Damage to rigging equipment from arcing

The main idea is recognizing which effects RF exposure can have directly on a person. RF energy that a person might be exposed to can be absorbed by body tissues, leading to heating, and in high-power situations can cause a painful RF burn on the skin. Those are direct effects on a person.

The statement about damage to rigging equipment from arcing describes harm to equipment rather than a direct physiological effect on a person from RF energy. While an arc can create dangerous conditions for someone nearby, the harm described is to the equipment itself, not a direct RF exposure effect on a person. Therefore, it is the one that does not represent a direct hazard to a person from RF exposure.

A painful RF burn

None of the above

Want more questions?

All options are one-time payments.

$25.99

30 day premium pass

All the basics to get you started

  • Ad-free experience
  • View your previous attempt history
  • Mobile app access
  • In-depth explanations
  • 30 day premium pass access
$59.99 $171.99 usd

6 month DELUXE pass (most popular)

Everything with the 30 day premium pass FOR 6 MONTHS! & the ultimate digital PDF study guide (BONUS)

  • Everything included in the premium pass
  • $171.99 usd value for $59.99! You save $106!
  • + Access to the ultimate digital PDF study guide
  • + 6 months of premium pass access
  • + Priority support
$15.99 $24.99

Ultimate digital PDF study guide

For those that prefer a more traditional form of learning

  • Available for instant download
  • Available offline
  • Hundreds of practice multiple choice questions
  • Comprehensive content
  • Detailed explanations
Image Description
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy